Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5614 13
Original file (NR5614 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

 

TIR
Docket No: 5614-13
6 June 2014

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552,

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 3 June 2014. The names and votes of the

members of the panel will be furnished upon request. Your
_ allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance
with administrative regulations and. procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with all
material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and
applicable statutes, regulations, and. policies.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. oo, er

You enlisted in’ the Navy and began a period of active duty on 28
February 1990. You served for about a year and two months
without disciplinary incident, but on 11 April and again on 29
duly 1991, you recéived nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for absence
from'your appointed place of duty and wrongful use of marijuana.
Subsequently, you were processed for an administrative separation
by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. After consulting with
legal counsel, you waived your ‘procedural right: to present your
case to an administrative: discharge: Board (ADB). On 27 August
1991, your commanding officer recommended discharge under other
than honorabie conditions by: reason of misconduct due to drug
abuse. On 3 September 1991, the discharge authority approved
this recommendation and directed separation under other than
honorable conditions by reason of misconduct, and on 23 September
1991, you were so discharged. ~ ~~ - -
The Board, in its review of your entire record and application,
carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as
your Desert Shield service, desire to upgrade your discharge, and
assertion that even though you were discharged for drug abuse,
you were not afforded counselling or treatment. Nevertheless,
the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant
recharacterization of your discharge because of the seriousness
of your misconduct which resulted in two NJPs. Further, you were
given an opportunity to defend your actions, but waived your
procedural right to present ‘your case to an ADB. Finally, there
is no evidence in the record, and you submitted none, to support
your assertion. Accordingly, your application has been denied.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

pt QD. Ao

ROBERT D. ALMAN
Acting Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR191 14

    Original file (NR191 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and: conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Boara found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3141-13

    Original file (NR3141-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701-5, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 - ARLINGTON, VA 22204-24906 : TIR

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07054-07

    Original file (07054-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 6 March 1989 at age 28. At that time you waived your right to consult...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2933-13

    Original file (NR2933-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Additionally, you were counseled and warned that further misconduct could result in administrative discharge action.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03220-09

    Original file (03220-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. On 15 April 1991 the discharge authority approved these recommendations and directed your...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3634 13

    Original file (NR3634 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 April 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given the fact that you...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 11198-07

    Original file (11198-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 26 February 1992 an ADB recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2648-13

    Original file (NR2648-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures» applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by — the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval _ record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR1830-13

    Original file (NR1830-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 January 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board found that on 24 September 1990, you were briefed on the Navy's policy regarding drug and alcohol abuse.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06469-08

    Original file (06469-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 May 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board further considered your assertion that if you were such a detriment to the Navy, you should not have been held by Navy authorities for five...